A coalition of 25 Republican state attorneys general is urging the Trump administration and Congress to suspend federal grants to the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), accusing the influential science organization of using taxpayer money to advance left-wing climate activism.
In a letter sent Thursday to several Trump cabinet secretaries and congressional committees, the AGs detailed a series of actions by NASEM that they say demonstrate bias and a lack of scientific objectivity. The letter, reported by the Capital Research Center, highlights two recent instances that the AGs argue warrant suspension or debarment of the organization from receiving federal funding.
Controversial Climate Chapter
The first issue involves NASEMâs role in producing the fourth edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, a joint project with the taxpayer-funded Federal Judicial Center (FJC) meant to provide judges with neutral guidance on complex scientific topics. The manualâs âReference Guide on Climate Scienceâ came under fire for being saturated with citations to left-wing climate activists and advocates, leading the FJC to retract the chapter in February after a wave of backlash.

NASEM, however, kept the guide online until earlier this month, when it announced it would temporarily remove the climate section while conducting an âindependent reviewâ of the process used to create it. That announcement followed President Trumpâs order for federal suspension and debarment officials to âreviewâ the matter.
But the attorneys general are skeptical of NASEMâs review, calling it âa shamâ in their letter. They argue that a genuine independent review would involve an external panel, exclude activists and litigants, publish its process and findings, and directly address the criticisms leveled at the chapter.
âCritics have demonstrated that the Chapter materially misquotes the [UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change], directly contradicts the manualâs statistics chapter, was apparently substantially ghost-written by climate plaintiffsâ attorney Michael Burger, and had funders, authors, and reviewers that included climate funders, activists, and litigation participants,â the AGs wrote.

They added that NASEMâs âdestruction of its own credibilityâ and its response to criticism âwarrant debarment or suspension by federal agencies.â
July Report Tied to Supreme Court Case
The AGs also took aim at a July NASEM report titled âAttribution of Extreme Weather and Climate Events and Their Impacts 2026.â They allege the report was âfunded, led,â and influenced by âclimate-litigation supportersâ and was released to give a boost to plaintiffs in an upcoming Supreme Court case, Suncor Energy v. County Commissioners of Boulder County, which involves lawsuits against fossil fuel companies.
According to the letter, NASEM timed the reportâs release so that the plaintiffs in Suncor could cite it in their Supreme Court briefs, while the defendantsâ filing deadline had already passed. The AGs point to a âconvenient coincidenceâ: one amicus group supporting the plaintiffs bragged about the timing, cited the report on ten pages of its brief, and received $100 million from the Bezos Earth Fundâwhich also funded NASEMâs report.

âAgencies may wish to look further into the nature of this convenient coincidence,â the letter reads.
Call for New Adviser
The AGs argue that taxpayer dollars should not be subsidizing NASEMâs âbiased actionsâ and urge federal agencies to consider suspension or debarment. They also call on Congress to identify an alternative entity for âobjective analysisâ and to consider revoking NASEMâs charter as the federal governmentâs designated adviser.
The case at the center of the controversy, Suncor v. Boulder, is scheduled to be argued before the Supreme Court on Oct. 5.
Source: thefederalist.com â https://thefederalist.com/2026/08/28/after-climate-activism-scandal-25-state-ags-push-feds-to-suspend-grants-to-national-science-org/
