In 1921, a German Jewish army veteran named Max Naumann founded an organization that would become one of history’s most unsettling paradoxes: the League of Nationalist German Jews, a group that openly supported Hitler’s rise to power. Now, a century later, an incendiary op-ed draws explicit parallels between this forgotten chapter and contemporary American politics.
The Nazis’ Unlikely Allies
The League, which peaked at several thousand members, didn’t just tolerate Nazi ideology—it actively courted it. Members adopted the Hitler salute, dismissed early reports of anti-Jewish violence as exaggerations, and reserved particular contempt for Eastern European Jews, whom they described in terms nearly identical to Nazi propaganda. Their leader Naumann insisted that full assimilation would protect them, famously predicting that ‘Aryan and Jew will once more join hands.’

History delivered a brutal verdict: After briefly tolerating the group as useful idiots, the Nazis arrested its members following the 1935 Nuremberg Laws. Most died in concentration camps.
From Weimar to Michigan
The op-ed’s provocation lies in its claim that similar dynamics play out today among progressive American Jews. It cites pre-midterm efforts by Michigan Jewish leaders to extract pro-Israel statements from Abdul El-Sayed—a progressive Democrat with family ties to Hamas supporters—as evidence of what it calls ‘ideological blindness.’ The comparison is intentionally jarring: left-leaning Jews today, the argument goes, repeat Naumann’s mistake by allying with those who would erase Jewish identity.

Critics will note the article’s polemical framing omits key differences—no modern progressive movement approaches Nazi-level genocidal intent. But its core question lingers: When does political alliance become self-betrayal? The League’s tragedy was its catastrophic misreading of Nazism’s ultimate goals. The op-ed implies some American Jews now misread the intentions of their political bedfellows.
A Warning From the Ashes
Historical analogies are always imperfect, often dangerous. But the article’s value—beyond surfacing a bizarre historical footnote—lies in asking when ideological loyalty overrides self-preservation. The League’s members weren’t ignorant of Nazi anti-Semitism; they rationalized it as temporary. Their story serves as a dark reminder that some alliances, once made, cannot be unmade.
Source: www.americanthinker.com — https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2026/11/the-jews-who-betrayed-their-own/
