Alaska Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan found himself in an unusual predicament Friday night when his official campaign account on X was temporarily suspended for purportedly violating the platform’s rules against inauthentic accounts — an ironic twist given that federal prosecutors are currently investigating whether Democrats recruited a same-name challenger to confuse voters in Tuesday’s election.
The account, @DanSullivan_AK, was flagged and taken down before being restored. The suspension came just days before Alaska voters head to the polls in what has become an increasingly contentious race marked by allegations of dirty tricks and ballot manipulation.
Republicans Cry Foul Over Suspension
Sullivan’s campaign and Chris Olmstead, a regional political director for the National Republican Senatorial Committee, quickly pointed fingers at Democrat Senate nominee Mary Peltola and her allies, accusing them of falsely reporting the senator’s account for impersonation.
“Insane how far Mary’s willing to go to trick Alaskans,” Olmstead wrote on X late Friday night.

Peltola’s campaign pushed back hard against the allegations. “These are silly and unsubstantiated claims from the Sullivan campaign,” a campaign spokesperson told KTUU News.
Federal Investigation Into Spoiler Candidate
The account suspension adds another layer to an already complicated situation. Just days earlier, the Justice Department sent subpoenas to Peltola’s campaign and the campaign of a second Dan Sullivan — a retired schoolteacher who was reportedly recruited to run as a spoiler candidate. Federal prosecutors are now investigating whether the effort to place this second Sullivan on the ballot violates federal conspiracy statutes.
The investigation follows reporting by The New York Times that traced the spoiler candidate effort to leftist operatives working alongside Peltola campaign staffers and national Democrats. The scheme allegedly began in the summer of 2025, when a Peltola staffer was instructed to search voter records and locate as many registered voters in Alaska named “Dan Sullivan” as possible.
The strategy appeared designed to exploit Alaska’s top-four primary and ranked-choice general election system, where voter confusion over candidate names could potentially siphon votes away from the Republican incumbent.

How the Scheme Unfolded
According to The New York Times investigation, Democrat operatives eventually found Dan J. Sullivan, a retired schoolteacher who harbored a grudge against President Donald Trump. He agreed to enter the race, creating the potential for voter confusion at the ballot box.
The Times’ reporting included details from fired Peltola campaign manager Elisa Rios, who served as the primary on-the-record source for the investigation. Rios later attempted to retract her statements, but The Times stood by its reporting, noting that her account aligned with other evidence the outlet had gathered.
That evidence reportedly included internal text messages showing national Democrats and campaign aides plotting the maneuver. The texts allegedly showed campaign operatives mocking unsuspecting voters and celebrating when the second Dan Sullivan survived a ballot challenge that could have removed him from the race.
Campaigns Trade Denials and Accusations
Despite the mounting evidence detailed in The Times investigation and the subsequent federal subpoenas, Peltola’s campaign has continued to deny recruiting spoiler candidates. The campaign has characterized the Republican accusations as unfounded political attacks.

The temporary suspension of Sullivan’s campaign account on X has only intensified tensions in the final days before the election. Republicans see the timing as suspicious, coming so close to Election Day and amid an ongoing federal investigation into alleged Democrat ballot manipulation tactics.
The suspension also raises questions about how social media platforms handle political accounts during election periods, particularly when multiple candidates share the same name and accusations of impersonation are flying in both directions.
Alaska’s Unique Electoral System
The controversy unfolds against the backdrop of Alaska’s relatively new electoral system, which features a top-four primary followed by a ranked-choice general election. This system, approved by voters in a 2020 ballot measure, was intended to give voters more choice and reduce partisan polarization.
However, critics have argued that the system can be gamed through tactics like recruiting same-name candidates to create confusion. The current investigation into the second Dan Sullivan’s candidacy may test whether such tactics cross the line from aggressive politicking into criminal conspiracy.
With Election Day approaching on Tuesday, Alaska voters will ultimately decide whether the confusion created by having two Dan Sullivans on the ballot — and the temporary suspension of the incumbent’s campaign account — will have any impact on the race’s outcome. The federal investigation, meanwhile, will likely continue long after votes are counted, potentially setting legal precedents for how electoral manipulation cases are handled in the future.
Source: www.dailywire.com — https://www.dailywire.com/news/real-dan-sullivan-gets-flagged-as-fake-days-before-election
