American Thinker column: ‘Leftist misogyny’ claims feminists project, cites Seattle mayor

A new opinion column published on American Thinker argues that the term “misogyny” is routinely misapplied, claiming that those who most often cry misogyny — left-leaning feminists — are in fact the worst offenders. Written by Noel S. Williams, the piece contends that leftist women use accusations of misogyny to deflect from their own shortcomings and to silence legitimate criticism, a dynamic the author says is enforced through social and professional consequences.

Williams writes that the word “misogyny” is “often misapplied,” asserting that misogynistic behavior is far rarer than the “liberation feminists” who invoke it would suggest. The column draws a parallel to the adage that “if everything is racist, then nothing is racist,” applying the same logic to charges of sexism. According to the author, leftist women facing criticism will “turn the tables by hurling misandrist labels” that threaten the reputations and livelihoods of the men who dare to challenge them.

Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson as Evidence

To illustrate the argument, Williams points to Seattle Mayor Missy Wilson, who is referred to in the piece as “Katie Wilson” in a likely typographical error. The column asserts that Wilson’s approval ratings are among the lowest ever recorded so early in a mayoral term, and notes that deliberations about a recall petition are already underway. The author uses Wilson as an example of a leftist woman in power, stating that “leftist women and power don’t mix well” and questioning who, beyond “indoctrinated Gen Zs and a smattering of geriatric socialists,” would want a powerful leftist woman.

The column goes further, suggesting that describing leftist women as “hysterical” is not misogynistic “if it is often true,” and makes broad assertions about their physical presence, vocal tone, and mental acuity — claiming that “nature has configured them to be feeble.” These statements are presented without supporting evidence or attribution, relying instead on the author’s subjective characterization.

Independence, Equality, and a “Spiritual Compass”

Williams also challenges the feminist ideals of independence and equality. The column argues that modern society requires specialization, making “independence” an unattainable goal. Even if leftist women formed a “dysfunctional sisterhood commune,” the author contends, they would inevitably rely on “toxic masculinity” to invent, fix, and build things. The author ridicules the notion of women performing traditionally male-dominated labor, asking when readers last saw a woman working on a roof, under a car, or operating an excavator — implying such roles are rare.

On equality, the column dismisses the concept as a “peculiar contrivance,” asserting that many leftist women are “adrift from reality.” Williams suggests that leftist women’s desire for liberation masks a mental imprisonment, and that lacking a “spiritual compass” makes them more prone to breakdowns. The author concludes that dispelling the “myth of equality” would allow leftist women to “attend to the needs and desires of the patriarchy more assiduously” — a remark that appears to be sarcastic but is stated plainly in the piece.

Projection and True Femininity

The column’s central argument is that leftist feminists engage in psychological projection. Williams claims that “the real misogyny” originates from “ugly and disgruntled leftists” directed at conservative women, specifically naming Natalie Harp and Karoline Leavitt. These women, the author says, are “lovely, smart, considerate, compassionate” and demonstrate “true femininity” by abiding by what the piece calls “nature’s imperatives.” The column invokes Helen B. Andelin’s 1965 book “Fascinating Womanhood,” which promoted traditional gender roles and domesticity, as a model for how conservative women earn respect.

The author closes by declaring that “fake feminism” is inferior to this idealized femininity, and asserts that conservative women are happier as a result. The piece ends with a call to prioritize free speech, stating that “the ability to speak our minds is crucial to the republic we cherish.”

American Thinker is a conservative online publication known for opinion and commentary pieces. This column reflects the site’s editorial stance and is not a news report. The article has drawn attention for its sweeping generalizations about leftist women and its use of gendered stereotypes to argue against feminist movements.

As with all opinion content, the views expressed are those of the author alone and are presented without journalistic fact-checking. Readers are encouraged to consider the arguments critically and seek out additional perspectives on the issues raised.

Source: www.americanthinker.com — https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2026/08/leftist-misogyny/