A Massachusetts-based blogger who was among the first to publish the name and photograph of the lone holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy trial is now suggesting that conservative commentator Jack Posobiec could face arrest for sharing a GiveSendGo fundraiser set up to protect that juror — a campaign that has grown to nearly $250,000, according to reporting from The Gateway Pundit.
The dispute marks the latest flashpoint in the aftermath of a trial that ended in a mistrial after one juror refused to join the rest of the panel in a verdict. The fundraiser, hosted on the Christian crowdfunding platform GiveSendGo, is designated for the juror’s security, legal fees, and lost wages.
The Juror at the Center of the Storm
The holdout juror, identified in interviews only as Michael, has been described by fellow jurors as the lone obstacle to an acquittal. According to The Gateway Pundit, female jurors shared details about him publicly and criticized his refusal to move off his position that Clancy committed a crime when she strangled her three young children. One juror said the holdout stood in the way of an effort to “change something to make it better for other women,” while others labeled him “arrogant” for being unable to move past the fact that Clancy had “viciously killed her children.”
Michael Marcel of Fugitive TV on YouTube later interviewed the juror and revealed that the holdout is a Black Haitian immigrant, a Catholic, and a Republican. According to Marcel’s account, the juror believes he may be getting targeted because of those characteristics. Marcel also said the juror described most of the panel as “activists” who were pushing to acquit Clancy and pressuring other jurors “from day one” to vote not guilty.
The juror told Marcel he was convinced of guilt based on the evidence presented in court, saying he concluded Clancy was not insane at the time and understood what she was doing. He was the only juror who did not ultimately yield to the pressure from the rest of the panel, and the impasse ended in a mistrial.
Kearney’s Allegations and the Legal Question He Raises
Aidan Kearney, the blogger who published the juror’s name and photo over a weekend, argued in a post that the GiveSendGo fundraiser that Posobiec shared could constitute witness intimidation. Kearney pointed to financial details he said he had uncovered about the juror, including that the juror owes more than $12,000 in unpaid rent and is in the middle of an eviction, and claimed the juror has “profited to the tune of over $100K because he voted the way that Jack Posobiec and others like him wanted him to vote, and in doing so impeded or interfered with a trial.”
Kearney’s framing of the fundraiser as potentially criminal drew a pointed rebuttal from Posobiec, who called Kearney “the scumbag who DOXXED the lone juror” and reshared the donation link, adding, “Have fun with that, scumbag.”
According to The Gateway Pundit, the GiveSendGo page was not created until after the mistrial was declared, a detail that would undercut the suggestion that donations were intended to influence deliberations that had already ended. The campaign’s own description frames it as a shield against political retaliation: “If they come for him, and they will, this is to cover security, lawyers, and lost work.”
A Fundraiser Closing in on Its Goal
The Gateway Pundit reported earlier in the week that the GiveSendGo page had already raised over $115,000 as of Monday morning. By the time of the outlet’s latest report, the total had climbed to nearly $250,000 — the ceiling the organizers originally set for the campaign.
The juror’s supporters say he has faced harassment and threats since his identity became public, and that the same treatment has extended to those backing him. The conflict has drawn in figures from outside the courtroom, with Posobiec — a prominent conservative commentator — using his platform to amplify the fundraiser and then responding directly to Kearney’s suggestion of legal consequences.
At the center of the back-and-forth is a question that has no clear answer yet: whether promoting a post-trial fundraiser for a juror can legally be construed as interfering with a trial that has already ended. Kearney asserts it can. Posobiec’s response — sharing the link again — suggests he is prepared to test that argument rather than retreat from it.
For now, the practical effect of the dispute has been to push the GiveSendGo campaign closer to its $250,000 target, as attention on the juror’s circumstances continues to generate donations.
Source: www.thegatewaypundit.com — https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/09/man-who-doxxed-holdout-juror-calls-jack-posobiec/