Brian Wilson’s ode to “California Girls” may have been a time-tested classic, but according to a new column at American Thinker, the sentiment behind it is aging fast. The piece, penned by Noel S. Williams, suggests that the cultural pendulum has swung so far that young American men are now looking halfway around the worldâspecifically to the Philippinesâfor what they see as more traditional, demure romantic partners.
The column, titled “Passport Bros: ‘I wish they all could be Filipina girls’,” taps into the growing online phenomenon of Western men traveling abroad for relationships, a trend that has coalesced under the banner of the “Passport Bros” movement. While critics often dismiss the movement as hedonistic or even problematic, Williams frames it as a rational response to what he characterizes as a deliberate rejection of classical beauty standards among young American women.
A ‘twisted’ beauty economy?
Williams’s argument centers on a paradox he sees in contemporary consumer behavior. He points to the continued success of beauty brands like E.L.F. Beauty, which recently raised its sales outlook and attracted bullish estimates from Wall Street firms. Yet, he argues, the primary consumers of these productsâGen Z womenâare using them not to enhance their natural appearance but to project what he calls an “unglamorous vibe.”
“In some twisted way that only a mixed-up feminist could understand, it is a perverted manifestation of their futile ‘I don’t need a man’ independence movement,” Williams writes. He suggests that the deliberate use of cosmetics to highlight blemishes rather than conceal them is a form of performative rebellion, one that is actively turning men off. “They want to turn men off, and it’s working,” he adds, noting that young men are “scampering for the hills.”

The appeal of the Philippines
For those men, the hills in question often happen to be in Southeast Asia. Williams identifies the Philippines as a favorite destination for the Passport Bros, a label he applies to men seeking not just casual encounters but long-term relationships with women who, in his view, comply with more traditional gender roles.
“I don’t blame themâFilipina ladies are generally happy and comfortable in their own skin, even unadorned with makeup,” he writes. “They are natural and authentic, not cosmetic. In addition to being quite lovely inside and out, they are less rebellious against the patriarchy and less likely to back-chat just for the sake of it.”
Williams’s characterization of Filipina women as more demure and accommodating than their Western counterparts is a centralâand controversialâpillar of the broader Passport Bros discourse, which often intersects with debates over feminism, masculinity, and cultural expectations. Critics of the movement argue that it can veer into objectification or reinforce problematic power dynamics, while proponents insist it is simply a matter of personal preference in a globalized dating market.
A musical nostalgia
Williams leans heavily on nostalgia to make his case, invoking the Beach Boys’ 1965 hit as a touchstone for a bygone era when, he claims, beauty was “not only in the eye of the beholder, but also reflected some degree of universal objectivity.” He lived in California for multiple years, he notes, and appreciates the old sentiment.

The column’s title is a play on the song’s famous refrain, but Williams extends the metaphor, borrowing other lyrics to describe the broader appeal of international romance. He mentions that Thai girls “really make you feel alright” and that Colombia girls “keep their boyfriends warm at night,” but he ultimately concludes that many Passport Bros would prefer, as the song goes, that they “all could be Filipina girls.”
A cultural flashpoint
The American Thinker piece is the latest entry in a growing genre of commentary that treats the Passport Bros movement as a barometer of Western social decay. The trend has gained significant traction on social media, where men share tips on travel, dating, and even relocation to countries where they feel their chances of finding a traditional partner are higher. The Philippines, with its large English-speaking population and a culture that often values family and modesty, has emerged as a focal point.
Williams’s framing, however, is notably more provocative than that of many travel bloggers. By tying the movement directly to a critique of Gen Z feminism and beauty culture, he positions it as a cultural rebuke rather than merely a practical travel hack. Whether that framing resonates broadly, or is seen as a caricature of complex social shifts, is likely to depend on the reader’s own cultural priors.
What is clear is that the conversation around the Passport Bros is not going away. As economic and social conditions continue to shape the dating landscape in the West, the allure of simplerâor at least differentâromantic prospects abroad will likely remain a popular topic for columnists and commenters alike, even if the debate over its merits shows no signs of resolution.
Source: www.americanthinker.com â https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2026/08/passport-bros-i-wish-they-all-could-be-filipina-girls/
